EXPLAIN ANALYZE
The EXPLAIN ANALYZE
statement works similar to EXPLAIN
, with the major difference being that it will actually execute the statement. This allows you to compare the estimates used as part of query planning to actual values encountered during execution. If the estimates differ significantly from the actual values, you should consider running ANALYZE TABLE
on the affected tables.
Synopsis
- ExplainSym
- ExplainStmt
- ExplainableStmt
ExplainSym ::=
'EXPLAIN'
| 'DESCRIBE'
| 'DESC'
ExplainStmt ::=
ExplainSym ( TableName ColumnName? | 'ANALYZE'? ExplainableStmt | 'FOR' 'CONNECTION' NUM | 'FORMAT' '=' ( stringLit | ExplainFormatType ) ( 'FOR' 'CONNECTION' NUM | ExplainableStmt ) )
ExplainableStmt ::=
SelectStmt
| DeleteFromStmt
| UpdateStmt
| InsertIntoStmt
| ReplaceIntoStmt
| UnionStmt
EXPLAIN ANALYZE output format
Different from EXPLAIN
, EXPLAIN ANALYZE
executes the corresponding SQL statement, records its runtime information, and returns the information together with the execution plan. Therefore, you can regard EXPLAIN ANALYZE
as an extension of the EXPLAIN
statement. Compared to EXPLAIN
(for debugging query exeuction), the return results of EXPLAIN ANALYZE
also include columns of information such as actRows
, execution info
, memory
, and disk
. The details of these columns are shown as follows:
attribute name | description |
---|---|
actRows | Number of rows output by the operator. |
execution info | Execution information of the operator. time represents the total wall time from entering the operator to leaving the operator, including the total execution time of all sub-operators. If the operator is called many times by the parent operator (in loops), then the time refers to the accumulated time. loops is the number of times the current operator is called by the parent operator. |
memory | Memory space occupied by the operator. |
disk | Disk space occupied by the operator. |
Examples
CREATE TABLE t1 (id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, c1 INT NOT NULL);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.12 sec)
INSERT INTO t1 (c1) VALUES (1), (2), (3);
Query OK, 3 rows affected (0.02 sec)
Records: 3 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE id = 1;
+-------------+---------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+--------+------+
| id | estRows | actRows | task | access object | execution info | operator info | memory | disk |
+-------------+---------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+--------+------+
| Point_Get_1 | 1.00 | 1 | root | table:t1 | time:757.205µs, loops:2, Get:{num_rpc:1, total_time:697.051µs} | handle:1 | N/A | N/A |
+-------------+---------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+--------+------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM t1;
+-------------------+---------+---------+-----------+---------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+------+
| id | estRows | actRows | task | access object | execution info | operator info | memory | disk |
+-------------------+---------+---------+-----------+---------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+------+
| TableReader_5 | 13.00 | 13 | root | | time:923.459µs, loops:2, cop_task: {num: 4, max: 839.788µs, min: 779.374µs, avg: 810.926µs, p95: 839.788µs, max_proc_keys: 12, p95_proc_keys: 12, rpc_num: 4, rpc_time: 3.116964ms, copr_cache_hit_ratio: 0.00} | data:TableFullScan_4 | 632 Bytes | N/A |
| └─TableFullScan_4 | 13.00 | 13 | cop[tikv] | table:t1 | proc max:0s, min:0s, p80:0s, p95:0s, iters:4, tasks:4 | keep order:false, stats:pseudo | N/A | N/A |
+-------------------+---------+---------+-----------+---------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Execution information of operators
In addition to the basic time
and loop
execution information, execution info
also contains operator-specific execution information, which mainly includes the time consumed for the operator to send RPC requests and the duration of other steps.
Point_Get
The execution information from a Point_Get
operator will typically contain the following information:
Get:{num_rpc:1, total_time:697.051µs}
: The number of theGet
RPC requests (num_rpc
) sent to TiKV and the total duration (total_time
) of all RPC requests.ResolveLock:{num_rpc:1, total_time:12.117495ms}
: If TiDB encounters a lock when reading data, it has to resolve the lock first, which generally occurs in the scenario of read-write conflict. This information indicates the duration of resolving locks.regionMiss_backoff:{num:11, total_time:2010 ms},tikvRPC_backoff:{num:11, total_time:10691 ms}
: When an RPC request fails, TiDB will wait the backoff time before retrying the request. Backoff statistics include the type of backoff (such asregionMiss
andtikvRPC
), the total waiting time (total_time
), and the total number of backoffs (num
).
Batch_Point_Get
The execution information of the Batch_Point_Get
operator is similar to that of the Point_Get
operator, but Batch_Point_Get
generally sends BatchGet
RPC requests to TiKV to read data.
BatchGet:{num_rpc:2, total_time:83.13µs}
: The number of RPC requests (num_rpc
) of the BatchGet
type sent to TiKV and the total time consumed (total_time
) for all RPC requests.
TableReader
The execution information of a TableReader
operator is typically as follows:
cop_task: {num: 6, max: 1.07587ms, min: 844.312µs, avg: 919.601µs, p95: 1.07587ms, max_proc_keys: 16, p95_proc_keys: 16, tot_proc: 1ms, tot_wait: 1ms, rpc_num: 6, rpc_time: 5.313996 ms, copr_cache_hit_ratio: 0.00}
cop_task
: Contains the execution information ofcop
tasks. For example:num
: The number of cop tasks.max
,min
,avg
,p95
: The maximum, minimum, average, and P95 values of the execution time consumed for executing cop tasks.max_proc_keys
andp95_proc_keys
: The maximum and P95 key-values scanned by TiKV in all cop tasks. If the difference between the maximum value and the P95 value is large, the data distribution might be imbalanced.rpc_num
,rpc_time
: The total number and total time consumed forCop
RPC requests sent to TiKV.copr_cache_hit_ratio
: The hit rate of Coprocessor Cache forcop
task requests.
backoff
: Contains different types of backoff and the total waiting time of backoff.
Insert
The execution information of an Insert
operator is typically as follows:
prepare:109.616µs, check_insert:{total_time:1.431678ms, mem_insert_time:667.878µs, prefetch:763.8µs, rpc:{BatchGet:{num_rpc:1, total_time:699.166µs},Get:{num_rpc:1, total_time:378.276µs }}}
prepare
: The time consumed for preparing to write, including expression, default value and auto-increment value calculations.check_insert
: This information generally appears ininsert ignore
andinsert on duplicate
statements, including conflict checking and the time consumed for writing data to TiDB transaction cache. Note that this time consumption does not include the time consumed for transaction commit. It contains the following information:total_time
: The total time spent on thecheck_insert
step.mem_insert_time
: The time consumed for writing data to the TiDB transaction cache.prefetch
: The duration of retrieving the data that needs to be checked for conflicts from TiKV. This step sends aBatch_Get
RPC request to TiKV to retrieve data.rpc
: The total time consumed for sending RPC requests to TiKV, which generally includes two types of RPC time,BatchGet
andGet
, among which:BatchGet
RPC request is sent in theprefetch
step.Get
RPC request is sent when theinsert on duplicate
statement executesduplicate update
.
backoff
: Contains different types of backoff and the total waiting time of backoff.
IndexJoin
The IndexJoin
operator has 1 outer worker and N inner workers for concurrent execution. The join result preserves the order of the outer table. The detailed execution process is as follows:
- The outer worker reads N outer rows, then wraps it into a task, and sends it to the result channel and the inner worker channel.
- The inner worker receives the task, build key ranges from the task, and fetches inner rows according to the key ranges. It then builds the inner row hash table.
- The main
IndexJoin
thread receives the task from the result channel and waits for the inner worker to finish handling the task. - The main
IndexJoin
thread joins each outer row by looking up to the inner rows' hash table.
The IndexJoin
operator contains the following execution information:
inner:{total:4.297515932s, concurrency:5, task:17, construct:97.96291ms, fetch:4.164310088s, build:35.219574ms}, probe:53.574945ms
Inner
: The execution information of inner worker:total
: The total time consumed by the inner worker.concurrency
: The number of concurrent inner workers.task
: The total number of tasks processed by the inner worker.construct
: The preparation time before the inner worker reads the inner table rows corresponding to the task.fetch
: The total time consumed for it takes for the inner worker to read inner table rows.Build
: The total time consumed for it takes for the inner worker to construct the hash table of the corresponding inner table rows.
probe
: The total time consumed by the mainIndexJoin
thread to perform join operations with the hash table of the outer table rows and the inner table rows.
IndexHashJoin
The execution process of the IndexHashJoin
operator is similar to that of the IndexJoin
operator. IndexHashJoin
operator also has 1 outer worker and N inner workers to execute in parallel, but the output order is not guaranteed to be consistent with that of the outer table. The detailed execution process is as follows:
- The outer worker reads N outer rows, builds a task, and sends it to the inner worker channel.
- The inner worker receives the tasks from the inner worker channel and performs the following three operations in order for every task: a. Build a hash table from the outer rows b. Build key ranges from outer rows and fetches inner rows c. Probe the hash table and sends the join result to the result channel. Note: step a and step b are running concurrently.
- The main thread of
IndexHashJoin
receives the join results from the result channel.
The IndexHashJoin
operator contains the following execution information:
inner:{total:4.429220003s, concurrency:5, task:17, construct:96.207725ms, fetch:4.239324006s, build:24.567801ms, join:93.607362ms}
Inner
: the execution information of inner worker:total
: the total time consumed by the inner worker.concurrency
: the number of inner workers.task
: The total number of tasks processed by the inner worker.construct
: The preparation time before the inner worker reads the inner table rows.fetch
: The total time consumed for inner worker to read inner table rows.Build
: The total time consumed for inner worker to construct the hash table of the outer table rows.join
: The total time consumed for inner worker to do join with the inner table rows and the hash table of outer table rows.
HashJoin
The HashJoin
operator has an inner worker, an outer worker, and N join workers. The detailed execution process is as follows:
- The inner worker reads inner table rows and constructs a hash table.
- The outer worker reads the outer table rows, then wraps it into a task and sends it to the join worker.
- The join worker waits for the hash table construction in step 1 to finish.
- The join worker uses the outer table rows and hash table in the task to perform join operations, and then sends the join result to the result channel.
- The main thread of
HashJoin
receives the join result from the result channel.
The HashJoin
operator contains the following execution information:
build_hash_table:{total:146.071334ms, fetch:110.338509ms, build:35.732825ms}, probe:{concurrency:5, total:857.162518ms, max:171.48271ms, probe:125.341665ms, fetch:731.820853ms}
build_hash_table
: Reads the data of the inner table and constructs the execution information of the hash table:total
: The total time consumption.fetch
: The total time spent reading inner table data.build
: The total time spent constructing a hash table.
probe
: The execution information of join workers:concurrency
: The number of join workers.total
: The total time consumed by all join workers.max
: The longest time for a single join worker to execute.probe
: The total time consumed for joining with outer table rows and the hash table.fetch
: The total time that the join worker waits to read the outer table rows data.
lock_keys execution information
When a DML statement is executed in a pessimistic transaction, the execution information of the operator might also include the execution information of lock_keys
. For example:
lock_keys: {time:94.096168ms, region:6, keys:8, lock_rpc:274.503214ms, rpc_count:6}
time
: The total duration of executing thelock_keys
operation.region
: The number of Regions involved in executing thelock_keys
operation.keys
: The number ofKey
s that needLock
.lock_rpc
: The total time spent sending an RPC request of theLock
type to TiKV. Because multiple RPC requests can be sent in parallel, the total RPC time consumption might be greater than the total time consumption of thelock_keys
operation.rpc_count
: The total number of RPC requests of theLock
type sent to TiKV.
commit_txn execution information
When a write-type DML statement is executed in a transaction with autocommit=1
, the execution information of the write operator will also include the duration information of the transaction commit. For example:
commit_txn: {prewrite:48.564544ms, wait_prewrite_binlog:47.821579, get_commit_ts:4.277455ms, commit:50.431774ms, region_num:7, write_keys:16, write_byte:536}
prewrite
: The time consumed for theprewrite
phase of the 2PC commit of the transaction.wait_prewrite_binlog:
: The time consumed for waiting to write the prewrite Binlog.get_commit_ts
: The time consumed for getting the transaction commit timestamp.commit
: The time consumed for thecommit
phase during the 2PC commit of the transaction.write_keys
: The totalkeys
written in the transaction.write_byte
: The total bytes ofkey-value
written in the transaction, and the unit is byte.
MySQL compatibility
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
is a feature of MySQL 8.0, but both the output format and the potential execution plans in TiDB differ substantially from MySQL.