SQL Prepare Execution Plan Cache
TiDB supports execution plan caching for Prepare
and Execute
queries. This includes both forms of prepared statements:
- Using the
COM_STMT_PREPARE
andCOM_STMT_EXECUTE
protocol features. - Using the SQL statements
PREPARE
andEXECUTE
.
The TiDB optimizer handles these two types of queries in the same way: when preparing, the parameterized query is parsed into an AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) and cached; in later execution, the execution plan is generated based on the stored AST and specific parameter values.
When the execution plan cache is enabled, in the first execution every Prepare
statement checks whether the current query can use the execution plan cache, and if the query can use it, then put the generated execution plan into a cache implemented by LRU (Least Recently Used) linked list. In the subsequent Execute
queries, the execution plan is obtained from the cache and checked for availability. If the check succeeds, the step of generating an execution plan is skipped. Otherwise, the execution plan is regenerated and saved in the cache.
In the current version of TiDB, if a Prepare
statement meets any of the following conditions, the query or the plan is not cached:
- The query contains SQL statements other than
SELECT
,UPDATE
,INSERT
,DELETE
,Union
,Intersect
, andExcept
. - The query accesses partitioned tables or temporary tables, or a table that contains generated columns.
- The query contains sub-queries, such as
select * from t where a > (select ...)
. - The query contains the
ignore_plan_cache
hint, such asselect /*+ ignore_plan_cache() */ * from t
. - The query contains variables other than
?
(including system variables or user-defined variables), such asselect * from t where a>? and b>@x
. - The query contains the functions that cannot be cached:
database()
,current_user
,current_role
,user
,connection_id
,last_insert_id
,row_count
,version
, andlike
. - The query contains
?
afterLimit
, such asLimit ?
andLimit 10, ?
. Such queries are not cached because the specific value of?
has a great impact on query performance. - The query contains
?
afterOrder By
, such asOrder By ?
. Such queries sort data based on the column specified by?
. If the queries targeting different columns use the same execution plan, the results will be wrong. Therefore, such queries are not cached. However, if the query is a common one, such asOrder By a+?
, it is cached. - The query contains
?
afterGroup By
, such asGroup By?
. Such queries group data based on the column specified by?
. If the queries targeting different columns use the same execution plan, the results will be wrong. Therefore, such queries are not cached. However, if the query is a common one, such asGroup By a+?
, it is cached. - The query contains
?
in the definition of theWindow Frame
window function, such as(partition by year order by sale rows ? preceding)
. If?
appears elsewhere in the window function, the query is cached. - The query contains parameters for comparing
int
andstring
, such asc_int >= ?
orc_int in (?, ?)
, in which?
indicates the string type, such asset @x='123'
. To ensure that the query result is compatible with MySQL, parameters need to be adjusted in each query, so such queries are not cached. - The plan attempts to access
TiFlash
. - In most cases, the plan that contains
TableDual
is not cached, unless the currentPrepare
statement does not have parameters.
The LRU linked list is designed as a session-level cache because Prepare
/ Execute
cannot be executed across sessions. Each element of the LRU list is a key-value pair. The value is the execution plan, and the key is composed of the following parts:
- The name of the database where
Execute
is executed - The identifier of the
Prepare
statement, that is, the name after thePREPARE
keyword - The current schema version, which is updated after every successfully executed DDL statement
- The SQL mode when executing
Execute
- The current time zone, which is the value of the
time_zone
system variable - The value of the
sql_select_limit
system variable
Any change in the above information (for example, switching databases, renaming Prepare
statement, executing DDL statements, or modifying the value of SQL mode / time_zone
), or the LRU cache elimination mechanism causes the execution plan cache miss when executing.
After the execution plan cache is obtained from the cache, TiDB first checks whether the execution plan is still valid. If the current Execute
statement is executed in an explicit transaction, and the referenced table is modified in the transaction pre-order statement, the cached execution plan accessing this table does not contain the UnionScan
operator, then it cannot be executed.
After the validation test is passed, the scan range of the execution plan is adjusted according to the current parameter values, and then used to perform data querying.
There are several points worth noting about execution plan caching and query performance:
- No matter an execution plan is cached or not, it is affected by SQL bindings. For execution plans that have not been cached (the first
Execute
), these plans are affected by existing SQL bindings. For execution plans that have been cached, if new SQL Bindings are created, these plans become invalid. - Cached plans are not affected by changes in statistics, optimization rules, and blocklist pushdown by expressions.
- Considering that the parameters of
Execute
are different, the execution plan cache prohibits some aggressive query optimization methods that are closely related to specific parameter values to ensure adaptability. This causes that the query plan may not be optimal for certain parameter values. For example, the filter condition of the query iswhere a > ? And a < ?
, the parameters of the firstExecute
statement are2
and1
respectively. Considering that these two parameters maybe be1
and2
in the next execution time, the optimizer does not generate the optimalTableDual
execution plan that is specific to current parameter values; - If cache invalidation and elimination are not considered, an execution plan cache is applied to various parameter values, which in theory also results in non-optimal execution plans for certain values. For example, if the filter condition is
where a < ?
and the parameter value used for the first execution is1
, then the optimizer generates the optimalIndexScan
execution plan and puts it into the cache. In the subsequent executions, if the value becomes10000
, theTableScan
plan might be the better one. But due to the execution plan cache, the previously generatedIndexScan
is used for execution. Therefore, the execution plan cache is more suitable for application scenarios where the query is simple (the ratio of compilation is high) and the execution plan is relatively fixed.
Currently, the execution plan cache is disabled by default. You can enable this feature by enabling the prepared-plan-cache
in the TiDB configuration file.
After the execution plan cache feature is enabled, you can use the session-level system variable last_plan_from_cache
to see whether the previous Execute
statement used the cached execution plan, for example:
MySQL [test]> create table t(a int);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> prepare stmt from 'select * from t where a = ?';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> set @a = 1;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
-- The first execution generates an execution plan and saves it in the cache.
MySQL [test]> execute stmt using @a;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select @@last_plan_from_cache;
+------------------------+
| @@last_plan_from_cache |
+------------------------+
| 0 |
+------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
-- The second execution hits the cache.
MySQL [test]> execute stmt using @a;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select @@last_plan_from_cache;
+------------------------+
| @@last_plan_from_cache |
+------------------------+
| 1 |
+------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
If you find that a certain set of Prepare
/ Execute
has unexpected behavior due to the execution plan cache, you can use the ignore_plan_cache()
SQL hint to skip using the execution plan cache for the current statement. Still, use the above statement as an example:
MySQL [test]> prepare stmt from 'select /*+ ignore_plan_cache() */ * from t where a = ?';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> set @a = 1;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> execute stmt using @a;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select @@last_plan_from_cache;
+------------------------+
| @@last_plan_from_cache |
+------------------------+
| 0 |
+------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> execute stmt using @a;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
MySQL [test]> select @@last_plan_from_cache;
+------------------------+
| @@last_plan_from_cache |
+------------------------+
| 0 |
+------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)